The Grandmaster: |
It is
unavoidable: applying the title of Wong Kar-wai’s new film, The Grandmaster (2013), to the author
himself. There is truly no way to range Wong with any illustrious group of
contemporary filmmakers. His fever and his melancholia; his unparalleled, poetic vision; his refined virtuosity –
these set him apart from many currently notable directors. Tradition – both
this rich genre’s canon (the elaborate Chinese action cinema’s historical
legacy) and his own, deeply ingrained sensibility – unmistakably defines Wong’s
style. But the radiance of this abundantly composite movie deserves to be
treated as a singular achievement.
This
utterly sensorial kaleidoscope, this irregular and oneiric fable, savagely jumps
in many directions and follows many different devices. The storytelling is
layered, blending – as usual in the work of this poet-director – small islands
of marvelously spectacular entities with some (epic) historical events, and
speeding up to the vertiginous from dreamy slowness. Here, the real novelty is
the amazing unity of contrasting methods. The famous martial arts wisdom:
principles of horizontal and vertical are the major directions that define the
game.
The bold
procedure in which opposites meet in one sweeping gesture (or scene) is
physically dizzying, on the verge of perceptibility. The extremely rapid and
bewitching, swinging magic cannot be separated, they mingle and live together.
We practically lose secure ground. The camera is running faster than the wind,
and stops blatantly for an unprepared moment, when suddenly everything is
falling apart into pieces. A drop of water detached from the unstoppable rain,
the red of blood, white snowflakes dance before our eyes, as if for eternity in
an otherworldly empire – but then, immediately, the fight follows at the
briskest pace, moving into such a high gear that any distinction is impossible.
Current time is trembling from billions of moving, broken actions, tiny details
– but then, as if everything has stiffened, we freeze on faces as they stare at
us like icons, with their almost divine beauty. We would happily admire the
gorgeous splendour; but then we are pushed forward, taken by the overpowering
acceleration. The syncopation brings about a bodily fever.
Talking
about the overall achievement of The
Grandmaster, I do not want to embrace all of the exceptionally abundant story. Sometimes it becomes a bit heavy and didactic,
insisting on factual details. However, even if some elements deter from the
characteristic style of the piece’s aesthetics, they maintain a spectacular mise en scène, as well as a geometrical
order in the setting and the placement of background figures.
The truly
mesmerising impact of the non-martial
arts confrontations, the emotional approaches or denials, are just as much
ritualised as the fights. They radiate a kind of solemnity; we move to the
level of the sublime. The extreme close-ups become sacred, especially with the
unusually reduced facial mimicry. The protagonists hardly blink; their gaze is
so keen and profound that the spectator simply has to follow their penetrating
power. The shot/reverse shot technique does not disturb the experience of this
immobility. We are in a different time-dimension, dictated by the unspeakable
suspense of emotions. Wong reuses, but in an even more subtle way, the
excitement of an almost closeness, as
celebrated in In the Mood for Love (2000).
At one
moment, we see the glitteringly beautiful faces of Ip Man (Tony Leung) and
Gong Er (Zhang Ziyi) so close, their skin, their breath, mouth and nose so
joined, so near to physical touch, that the encounter expresses the deepest
visceral, sexual attraction. They seem to be unified. Yet, they never cross
this border. Thanks to the durée, the
whole ‘story’ is far beyond reality. It is not their phantasy but their desire that becomes visible, thus
stirring the desire of the spectator. Wong dares to move the image-frame
around; he rotates the irreal, imaginary moment. No banal touch or caress could
occur in their encounter; they become one and yet distant, both spellbound.
However,
one should keep in mind that this is their fateful contest, their do-or-die
situation, when finally the invincible Ip Man will be, for the first time in
his life, defeated – although we should not overstress this match’s outcome.
Wong’s fantastic elegance: this post-moment will never be overly demonstrated. Because here the strange sensuality, the sexually charged, finds
its expression beyond any customary mode. This is another mood for love,
forever open, never satisfied, exceeding the factual event. We identify with
people and with human feelings far beyond the results of an event; therefore it
outshines any practical, plot aspect.
Another
high point of the solemn ritual confrontation: the hero’s incredible skill, and
the patience with which he defeats his partner, the old master Chan Wah-shun
(Yuen Woo-ping). The dance is highly choreographed, changing positions rapidly,
waiting silently for the next, appropriate moment. This non-fight fight is more
suspenseful than any clash; the smallness, the insignificance of the challenge
only heightens the deadly seriousness of the stakes. To break a small, round
cake held by the old man may not seem to be a serious test. But, according to
the real rules of the game, it is a highly challenging task. Elegant, measured,
restrained, disciplined actions, clear strategy expressed through a minimalist
design, plus unexpected moments of changing rhythm: slow, and suddenly fast,
alternate in an unforeseeable beat. It is enough that we recognise the victory,
the well-deserved success.
The
ambiance of the movie is imbued with poetically rendered emotions. The
characters’ inner life, their longing, remembrance, the evocations of their
former unforgettable moments, will be the decisive, ‘everlasting’ experience.
The cruelty of war, the suffering of so many losses – family, home, well-being
and honour – are, of course, grievous, although they are presented in an
oblique way: as broken and ineradicably engraved memories. Evoking for a moment
even a once-framed family photograph on the wall (this could easily be a
cliché, but in its ephemeral appearance it becomes a captivating allusion) as
the only blurred copy of a past common harmony; or a moment of joy, when Ip
Man presents a beautiful fur coat to his wife, Cheung Wing-sing (Song Hye-kyo)
– small fragments which contribute to the ‘musical’ melancholia, a noble
mourning over buried, sorrowful wounds.
From this
viewpoint, the two basic principles – of horizontal and vertical expansion –
gain a deeper meaning. The full power of the horizontal movement gains its
force from the weight of the vertical: as if the ‘search of lost time’ was the
heart of the movie.
A
seemingly small, astute motif: the role of a button from the fur coat which
receives later, surprising importance, poignantly revealing the Master’s
destitute situation. During the Japanese occupation, he has to take the coat of
his beloved wife to the pawnbroker, who reminds the seller that one button is
missing. Much, much later, while daydreaming of Gong Er, the once victorious
‘64 hands’ beauty, Ip brings the button back to her – not to the deceased wife it belonged to, but to the secret,
unrealised love (who refuses it). The free yet composite unravelling of the
emotional story returns to its origins; their hidden love-story runs full
circle.
The scene
is totally irrational. In whose imagination are we this time? We started with
Gong, the woman who could never have knowledge of this detail, but then
suddenly we shift to Ip Man, who stares motionless at her, imagining that she sits across the table
… The duality is also spelled out by Gong when she confesses that Ip was
always in her heart – and, although he does not respond, he is looking at her
with profound emotional passion, and so we understand that he (although not
physically present) shares the feeling, the unspoken love is mutual … Fantasy,
empathy, desire create a wished-for reality, far beyond the factual, physical
truth.
We constantly
admire the unusual beauty of the film, which appears at first glance to be merely
a riveting action movie. However, the intense exploitation of its vertical
potential, the courage to unravel the hidden level of human destinies, places
it far beyond this. The grand, epic tradition did not exclude sensitive,
lyrical elements; but Wong has interwoven the most modern procedures into it.
It is
worth looking back at the arc preceding the artist’s most recent work. His
classical films, his Hong Kong blues – Days of Being Wild (1990), Chungking
Express (1994), Fallen Angels (1995)
and In the Mood for Love – already fascinated the spectator with their
stirring, poetically heated tone and extravagant structures. In these films,
the ongoing present, everything which occurred in the moment, became sensual –
an inner experience. In the course of the narratives, painful memories and
melancholic imaginings were always depicted as normal actions, with an
identical intensity. The destiny of his heroes has always been the outcome of
their turbulent selves, shaken by desire and deception, defined at once by
past, future and the potential, the would-be:
they are all parts of an indivisible reality, working as an interior time.
We can
ask which aspect is most overwhelming in the overall impression: the
jam-packed, thickening space; the unruly environment’s density and speed that frames existence; or the nuanced design of human feelings?
Surely, in this tumultuous field of actions, where people had to live their
time, it is fully understandable that fate is troubled, always interrupted.
Therefore, we could reverse the question: is it not the accumulation of time,
its intensity, which carries people along in an ever-changing space – a speedy
time that pushes them forward for new constraints and trials? Rhythm and tempo
move in extremes, contesting and living next to each other, revealing the
incongruence of elements.
The inner
order of existence is never transparent. It accumulates not one layer of time
but countless layers that collide and clash with each other. In Wong’s vision,
each moment brings about a new form. The anomalous outcomes of actions are
surprising, but never contingent. This density and swinging nature of the
chaos-sphere is grounded, as modern physics describes it, in the ‘fragility of
initial conditions’; this is what determines its erratic behaviour. In this
manner, Wong does not pay the same attention to cause and effect but, within
this constant motion, he wants to feel the connections between things, these
uncertain consequences that alter continuous actions. Which
explains the dense complexity of the film’s texture, with its unpredictable
aftermaths, surprises, and the intrusion of ‘foreign’ elements. Like in
the work of Jorge Luis Borges or Italo Calvino, the otherness of the various
components is not concealed; they are all disturbingly evident.
|
Is this
uncertainty the basis of his famous nostalgia? ‘According to me, time
irremediably deprives us of our innocence. In the way we are moving ahead, we
must turn back, remembering things we were dreaming about, and have remained
dead letters. It is upsetting to think about the fact of how much we could have
lived through, things we have left undone’. (1)
We have to bear in mind that Wong’s personal biography has contributed to his loss of ‘innocence’. In his first films, he clearly voiced his alienation from Hong Kong’s new customs and language. Something was lost in the change of home, lifestyle, the broken familiarity of the ‘old’ period. But, despite this visceral feeling, his vision is more complex, based both on horizontal (historical) and vertical (emotional) experience. For his melancholia does not stem from regret over any lost past. It is the present that becomes more and more unfathomable, troubled, driving us to a deeper comprehension; he has perhaps realised that one cannot simply become part of the surrounding world. The haunting speed that causes people to drift makes it impossible to fully embrace one’s own existence. Wong is not an exponent of Nietzsche’s ‘gay science’; his special mood expresses an existential melancholia. |
1. Jean-Marc Lalanne et al, Wong Kar-wai (Paris: Dis Voir, 1997), p. 85.
|
from Issue 4: Walks |
© Yvette Bíró and LOLA August 2013. Cannot be reprinted without permission of the author and editors. |