'The Child That I Was': |
Seven
films already, and Terrence Malick never repeats himself. This new work caps an involuntary trilogy after his two
preceding films, The Tree of Life (2011)
and To the Wonder (2012), but displaces
the themes, forms, places. Knight of Cups is the story of an existential crisis experienced by Rick (Christian Bale), a
successful screenwriter. Haunted by family crisis, the death of a brother, the
figure of the father; drifting through drunken receptions and illicit, private
clubs, given over to the illusion of fun: this semi-autobiographical character
of Rick crosses the film in a drug-filled stupor, carried along and betrayed by
his body, tortured by the sensation of existential emptiness.
Long
admired (especially when he’s not making films), Malick today disarms the public, who wish they could have greater empathy for his
heroes, and are disturbed by the silence of the actors, the seemingly
old-fashioned, spiritual themes, the torrent of shots and voice-overs. What
they could find here, in place of a ‘relatable’ guy, whether raging or innocent,
in fact corresponds to a very American temperament: naïve in its quest for
purity, didactic in its search of generosity, fragmented by an overflow of ideas
and sensations, spectacular in its love of cinema.
Despite this love
for celluloid, the labyrinth of experience is also expressed, this time around,
using digital means (GoPro, Red, Alexa)
in order to capture an individual’s vibrations via an appropriate, experimental
texture, keyed to the mood of each situation. Filmed in wide angle, overturned
or populated with grotesque creatures, the modern world suddenly resembles an
unknown planet through which our hero stumbles – with his ultimate wish to get
out of the tunnel and head for a New World.
Where To the Wonder was lyrical, Knight of Cups is more liturgical. Reference
to the Tarot divides the narrative into chapters and provides the film’s title.
The Knight of Cups is an artist character, in search of love, ready to let himself be seduced, or bored. In the packed musical tapestry,
two pieces, two leitmotivs guide the
spectator and give the impression of an ancient tale: Wojciech Kilar’s Exodus and Vaughan Williams’ Tallis Fantasia. The former, a tragic Bolero,
makes us feel the endlessness of this quest; while the latter grasps the
majesty of its strong moments and fermata. Both pieces of music share an
archaic model that is recurrent in Malick: ecstatic
melody, modality, repetitive hymn, unison or polyphony.
The
result is a moral poem that sanctions the waste of lives, and easy success.
From Los Angeles to Las Vegas, a parade of top models, orgies, fashion images,
waves of naked female bodies who are more or less anonymous: this new Malick explores a Dionysian carnival where pleasured faces
end up evoking death-heads. This vast Vanity is built upon Christian schema that serve as its pillars. An allegory drawn from
John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress offers an introduction, inviting us to see in Rick an Oriental Prince suddenly
plunged into the illusion of carnal love. The Vanity does not merely condemn
the kaleidoscope of earthly beauties; it also celebrates them.
In
our present, Malick seizes the ineluctable pertinence
of the spiritual question for a noble conscience, amidst the abundance of
cultural shards, and the progressive loss of meaning entailed by the lethargy
of our assailed senses. This is an art that possesses the intelligence of
myths-to-come, and which reactivates the value of Mystery. The pervasive
disdain it has met seems to us (alas) quite predictable, but unjustifiable.
The
material’s silence – which is the source of its drama – feeds the impression
left by Malick’s films: spiritual for some, and for others a testament to the desertion of the
divine. At once ecstatic and depressive. Cities are
empty avenues, monuments of metal, lifts/aquariums/mausoleums. Amidst Kubrickian corridors comprising immense, desolate
galleries, Rick is found in a cage at the centre of an orgy, and Las Vegas is
called … a stinking dungeon. The lovely striptease artist Karen (Teresa Palmer)
embodies an illusionistic moral: all simulacra replace a forgotten, ideal
reality. The actor-seducer Tonio (Antonio Banderas) embodies the empiricist adage: no rules, only
consequences. Water, an obsession of this filmmaker, appears everywhere: water
imprisoned in human fabrications, the free water of oceans, water which revives
… all before a silent Rick, who staggers like a zombie for the whole film.
The
human body opens up the range of pleasures, but it is also weighed down, troubled
by nostalgia for flight. Thus, on one side, the series of winged figures:
mobile, unknowable women. On the other side, the underwater shots, childhood
refuge or hallucinatory view of the swimming pool’s floor where the hedonist Tonio walks, he who sullies
the water with the weight of the civilised body, the body of illusion. Like The Pilgrim’s Progress, Knight of Cups has the semblance of a
dream. Rick himself calls it a theatre of the mind – father, brother, beloved
women move about there, silent or furious, round and around each other. Rick,
this sub-Gatsby, orphan of the vibrant, green light, discovers the strangeness
within himself (I live with an unknown) and vainly seeks an illusion of
existence for others (let me tell you about yourself). Like in The Last Tycoon, an inaugural earthquake
comes to wake him up. A monumental, melancholic, modern
wandering – European like Antonioni, American like Hopper, Fitzgerald or Sydney
Pollack.
Around
Rick there dances a rondo of female portraits, sometimes traced in just a few
shots, erotic tableaux, intimate mini-films. Hardened by disappointment, Nancy
(Cate Blanchett) is the
most alive: a doctor devoted to lepers, marked by a mournful generosity. Elizabeth
(Natalie Portman) is the heroine of an adulterous romance: in just a few shots,
the spectator experiences the ardour of desire, doubt, an event (she falls
pregnant), and the farewell to passion (the sublime shot of the household door
re-shut, which says everything). Between the unknown women without clothes and
the sublime (even oddly masculine) fashion models, there also parades the fashion
ingénue, Della (Imogen Poots),
driven by bourgeois idleness and anxious coquettishness; or the hypnotic model,
Helen (Freida Pinto), contemporary version of the
Oriental seductress who ultimately forecloses mystery. Most fugitive of all,
the luminous, silent Isabel (Isabel Lucas) extends the young, phantom, female ‘guide’
glimpsed in The Tree of Life:
spiritual mentor when she shows the way in the desert, and an epiphany when she
descends naked into the pool, a liberating angel who disrupts the pervasive,
puritan antinomy of flesh/spirit. After To
the Wonder which wove sweet choreographies of female bodies, Knight of Cups celebrates these
beauties, the temptation of which it seems, at one moment, to condemn – but it
ends up as an ode to woman-eroticism-energy.
The
infinite subtlety of the film lets us sense the melancholia lodged inside its
every moment. To love, and to feel the sadness. The search for love, and the difficulty of expressing it. The belief in fashioning one’s energy from the repetition of the
same, old mistakes. To see the way out, without being
able to reach it. Intermittences and paradoxes grasped all at once
through the ceaseless collage of shots, words and sounds.
This
poetry is a resistance and a provocation within contemporary cinema. It speaks a nostalgia for a world full of spirit(s). But also, in one
or two key shots, a nostalgia for the aquarium of magical fauna that lit up
childhood. We forget to our detriment this essential quest in Malick – those eyes which dream up watery nymphs here, or
dinosaurs and a levitating mother elsewhere. The meanders of Knight of Cups belong to those who have
opened their eyes for the first time to a world that, through habit, they
usually screen out. This childhood nostalgia is, as well, amplified by a
sorrowful energy aimed at reconstructing enchantment – despite that sad trail
of lost virginities which constitutes existence.
This review
appeared in Positif, no. 658 (December 2015), pp. 9-10. Reprinted with permission.
|
from Issue 6: Distances |
Original French text © Pierre Berthomieu, December 2015. English translation © Adrian Martin, December 2015. Cannot be reprinted without permission of the author and editors. |